Dark Mode Light Mode

Keep Up to Date with the Most Important News

By pressing the Subscribe button, you confirm that you have read and are agreeing to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use
Follow Us
Follow Us

Keep Up to Date with the Most Important News

By pressing the Subscribe button, you confirm that you have read and are agreeing to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use
Virgin Money Revamps Retrofit Range
“Fine” the agency that will be fined by the court after completing the tenant issue
MPC Rate Reaction: Easy to Do

“Fine” the agency that will be fined by the court after completing the tenant issue

The Scotland First Level Court found that Inverness landlord Maz Willie endorses her claim that the agency failed to properly manage Cullander's property (main photo).

Wyllie had signed a management agreement with Forth Residential, which included a six-month inspection.

Advertisement

Unlisted damage

When the tenants left at the end of the contract, the exit stock caused little damage. However, when Wiley went to the property, the landlord claimed she had found damages that were not listed.

The tenants were allowed to have dogs, but they had broken downpipes stained on the wall. There was also a cat and a few budgies, and the cat damaged holes in the walls of the living room.

Catriona Flanagan, Force Residential
Catriona Flanagan, Force Residential

Wiley added that she had to deal with TDS herself to get compensation for damages and that she had not received anything when she left it to her agency.

Agency director Catriona Flanagan told the court that she denied that she had failed to manage the property, but apologized to the landlord for the upset. She said, “I looked into it all.”

The broken downpipe was overlooked as it was dry during inspection and the tenant didn't let them know that there were no additional pet signs during the visit.

It should have been an obvious repair issue. ”

The court agreed with Flanagan except for the broken downpipe issue, saying, “It was an obvious repair issue that should have been noticed.”

Therefore, by allowing the legal agent's enforcement order, Forth Residential was fined £102 and ordered to pay £300 for “pain and inconvenience.”

Read the complete judgment.


Keep Up to Date with the Most Important News

By pressing the Subscribe button, you confirm that you have read and are agreeing to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use
Add a comment Add a comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Previous Post

Virgin Money Revamps Retrofit Range

Next Post

MPC Rate Reaction: Easy to Do

Advertisement